4. Ambassadors. Use of Navigator

The platform offers a basic tool for any user: the Graph or “Navigator” browser. Through it, users can perform two functions:

• Access the formal analysis of the Opinion Space (Debate Clubs) made by the Scientific Area, the result of the dialogue and debate between both areas.

• Define a personal position with respect to the opinions formalized by the Debate Clubs, which will serve for a much more personalized experience in the world of mestaverse.

The graph is an mathematic object made from the Scientific Area in a dynamic way, which formalizes the Opinion Space from the Debate Clubs, through modeling of the resulting information by means of basic axioms, free grouping of them (axiomatic consortiums), and “legal corpus" that evaluate the present and future legal feasibility of the consortiums.

The Navigator is a simplified version of the tools used by the Scientific Area, to allow users of the platform an intuitive navigation through the Opinion Space. Let's see its structure and possibilities.

Within the social network of debate-studio.org, we will see the icon from which the Navigator is accessed, on the right side of the screen. By pressing, we access the tool.

In zone 1 (taxonomies) are all the classes that agglutinate the nodes of the graph. By clicking on any of its elements, the corresponding class will be positioned in the center of visual zone (2). Zone 3 is a text space that shows the information contained in nodes.

BASIC USE OF THE GRAPH

In figure 1, when unfolding the class Axiom, it is observed that the graph has three axioms: Eugenics and bioethics, Crispr Cas13 boosting, and Crispr Cas9. We also see how the class Axiom “dealswithTopic" with the class Topic (since an axiom will always be linked to an notice or "topic" made by a Debate Club and formalized from the Scientific Area). Finally, we also see that each of these "topics" or formal notices from Debate Clubs, will be linked as we say (belongsToClub), to their respective issuers, the Debate Clubs (belonging to the DeebateClub class).

In figure 2, unfolding the Topic class, we verify that in graph there are two “topics”: Poshumanism tools, and Bioethics regulation. We have not yet selected any specific axiom or "topic", we are only evaluating the global contents of the classes...

In figure 3, we display the class DebateClub and verify that the graph has two Debate Clubs: Crispr Cas9, and Eugenics regulation.

Note that up to now, each class indicates in its respective index, the total number of elements that a graph has in its category (3 axioms, 2 topics and 2 Debate Clubs).

Suppose we want to evaluate only the axioms that have to do with a specific Debate Club, for example, the club Crispr Cas9... To do this, we click on said club (which will replace the class Debate Club with the specific instance or node Crispr Cas9).

In figure 4, we can verify that having Crispr Cas9 selected as Debate Club, when clicking on Asiom, the number of axioms has been reduced from 3 to 2 (compare with image 1). In this way, we have proceeded to filter those that were issued only from the club Crispr Cas9, and now we can evaluate them by clicking on each one...

EVALUATION OF AN AXIOM

Once a specific axiom has been selected, several buttons will appear in the taxonomy area, and we will be able to define our opinion about it. In the example, we see that the user's last evaluation of the axiom Eugenics and bioethics, after reading the content at the bottom of the page, was the label NECESSARY.

This evaluation will be recorded associated with the user. In addition, said user will be able to change their evaluation at any time by accessing this same functionality and re-evaluating the node with a new rating.

EVALUATION SCOPE

Navigator organizes the Opinion Space into three classes of nodes evaluable by any user:

• Axioms: These are the most basic "bricks" that model the Opinion Space. An Axiom is an sentiment defended by any Debate Club, which after being submitted at the request of said club, to interviews and debates moderated by the Scientific Area, publicly and broadcast on the Internet, is evaluated by this area, scientifically justified, and agreed with the Debate Club, as "locally irreducible". This means that said sentiment expressed by the Debate Club is finally considered by itself as belief not causally derived from other sentiments of greater causal independence.

An Axiom issued to a Debate Club may coincide with previous Axioms issued to other Debate Clubs. In this case, the Scientific Area's policy is to unify the same Axioms into a single one, under prior consensus with the requesting club. In any case, said club will be linked in Navigator to the Axioms that have been granted, which may be consulted at a public level.

• Axiomatic Bubbles: These are groups of Axioms freely requested by each Debate Club, to generate complex semantic content based on sets of interrelated Axioms. Said unions do not require authorization and only have to be requested from the Scientific Area for their direct inclusion in Navigator.

• Axiomatic Consortiums: These are groups of Axiomatic Bubbles, normally motivated by negotiations between Debate Clubs that want to jointly defend ideological spaces (Axiomatic Consortiums) that are larger than those defended individually. These unions are free and only have to be requested to the Scientific Area for their direct inclusion in Navigator.

• Legal Corpus: The Consortiums can request to the legal department of the Scientific Area, an analysis of present and future legal feasibility, with respect to a possible social structure in the metaverse, which accepts the axiomatic of the Consortium as an internal coexistence regulation. Said analysis must be rigorously justified and based on international legal rigor. In any case, said Scientific Area task will not be required to the platform given the foreseeable complexity, and in any case, its publication in Navigator will finally be decided by mutual agreement with the requesting Consortium.

PRIVACY OF YOUR EVALUATIONS

Your personal link to your positions on graph can only be known by yourself. In other words, beyond the legal requirements contained in the Terms of Use, no one can access said personal link. This technical impossibility therefore includes Scientific Area's collaborators, the technical staff of the platform, and any other user of the Opinion Space.

BE AN AMBASSADOR OF DEBATE-STUDIO.ORG

Defining your personal position in a broad and precise way with respect to the opinions expressed by Debate Clubs, will allow you to collaborate as an ambassador in an altruistic way in the mission of our Manifest, in two very important aspects of it:

• For the definition and testing of the Graph that we must negotiate with the rest of the Metaverses to eliminate the bias in the use of basic resources (see Manifest).

• In addition, you will be included in the experimental tests of a first unprecedented experimental metaverse, free of bias, which will implement free transit through the Opinion Graph at sensory and social levels, and which will serve as a model for the cause of the Manifest.